Detailed Notes on khula case law in pakistan
Detailed Notes on khula case law in pakistan
Blog Article
If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is normally only carried out Should the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded for the allegations as such they were nicely aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to generally be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which change depending over the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case regulation citation in the state court might not be proper, or perhaps accepted, in the U.
In that sense, case regulation differs from a single jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in New York would not be decided using case regulation from California. Alternatively, Big apple courts will analyze the issue depending on binding precedent . If no previous decisions around the issue exist, Big apple courts may have a look at precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority alternatively than binding authority. Other factors like how previous the decision is and also the closeness into the facts will affect the authority of the specific case in common regulation.
If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only performed In case the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were nicely aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use for being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed to the disposal of the moment petition around the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and also private respondents and will take care of the many aspects of the case and guarantee that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
However it is made clear that police is free to get action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities issue to law. However no harassment shall be caused for the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also be certain respect in the family drop in accordance with legislation and should they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they can act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security of your house is concerned, which is not really public place under the Act 1977. 9. Contemplating the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has become realized. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of in the get more info terms stated previously mentioned. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support with the Supreme Court, guaranteeing the enforcement of its judgments. As being the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, the decision of your Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. Read more
The regulation as recognized in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Only the written opinions on the Supreme Court and also the Court of Appeals are routinely readily available. Decisions from the lower (trial) courts are certainly not generally published or distributed.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Referring to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition may be dismissed. This is because service from the grievance notice is a mandatory requirement along with a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law demands that a grievance notice be served about the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) When the organization is transprovincial.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety days. In case the appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then tactic the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety times with the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're guided through the decision from the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar challenge. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in applying the regulation. This example of case law refers to two cases listened to inside the state court, for the same level.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It's also a perfectly-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.